Wednesday, September 18, 2013


The Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution states that people have the right "to be secure in their persons, houses, paper, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures," and that "no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause."

How is it possible to protect your fourth amendment rights when drones equipped with powerful video cameras and infrared (thermal imaging) devices are capable of seeing through the roof of your house? Drones can also be fitted with radar speed-cameras and other miniaturized equipment capable of performing chemical analyses, environmental sampling, industrial emission monitoring, radiation detection, and much more.


Do you feel more secure knowing that you are being watched?

As more and more surveillance cameras and drones are deployed your life will be an open book to any government agency that wants to harass or destroy you.

P.S. Don't look in your rear-view mirror; you might be surprised what you see!
This blog is not affiliated with

Saturday, September 07, 2013


A local Prescott man called for John McCain to be arrested and tried for treason.

American citizens are mad. They are fed up! Our government no longer represents the will of the people as you can hear in the video above. Look at the pictures of the military servicemen in the previous article. The military is waking up. The civilian population is finally waking up to the lies and propaganda mean't to lead us into another unjust war to carve up the Middle East for the globalists to institute a new economic and political system no matter what the cost in American lives.

The U.S. military is to defend our 50 states from outside intruders; not to be used as cannon fodder to serve the globalist objective of carving up the Middle East. Syria poses absolutely no threat to the United States. Yet the commander-in-chief, a winner of the noble peace prize(?) wishes to become the aggressor and bomb and or invade a sovereign nation. No wonder that foreign governments view America with disdain.

From we learn:
Millions of Americans are completely overloading the phone lines of Congress in a historical, unprecedented response to shut down the Obama war machine.

This comes in the wake of the recent Reuters poll that found only 9% of respondents back Obama in his quest for a military strike on Syria.

Here’s a sample run-down of statements made by House and Senate members showcasing the almost unanimous opposition from their constituents for a war in Syria:

"I've been hearing a lot from members of our Armed Forces. The message I consistently hear: Please vote no on military action against Syria." Representative Justin Amash.

-Rep. Rand Paul, (R-Ky.) said "I’m told the phone calls are 9 out of 10 against a strike in Syria, from my constituents in Kentucky."

"My office has been inundated with constituent phone calls and emails about Syria. Virtually unanimous opposition to military intervention"....Representative Michele Bachmann.

- Rep. Matt Salmon, (R-Az.) admitted to National Review that 498 out of the 500 calls to his office were completely against an attack on Syria.

"In two short days, I've received 126 calls opposing military engagement in Syria and only one call in favor."....Representative Thomas Massie
According to ABC News:
More than 100 anti-war protesters voiced their opposition to President Barack Obama's call for a U.S. military strike against Syria in a rally outside the White House.

Chanting "They say more war; we say no war," speakers say Saturday's picket line marks a line Congress should not cross as it prepares to vote on the issue.

Concerns over military action spawned other protests across the country, including one in New York City's Times Square.
Posted below is a No War with Syria Rally in Nashville, TN. covered by the mainstream media.

I take issue with the news reporters reporting of the facts in the video. He states that public opinion is evenly split on the issue of war with Syria. Obviously he hasn't contacted his local congressional representative or Senator to hear what their constituents are saying. But then what can you expect from mainstream media who will always follow what the State Department and military industrial complex want.

The whole pretext for bombing and invading Syria is based on outright lies. Lies! Lies! Lies! The biggest lie is that Assad ordered his troops to use chemical weapons on his own population but the international news media contradicts this statement.

Another lie is that by sending 200 cruise missiles into Syria, that it will hasten Assad's fall from power. Again the international news media contradict this claim put out by the Obama administrations talking heads.
BERLIN, September 8(RIA Novosti) – German intelligence sources suggest that last month's alleged chemical weapons attack in Damascus was not ordered by Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, Bild am Sonntag has reported.

The newspaper said citing German intelligence that President Assad is likely to remain in power for a long time, even if the United States conducts military strikes on Syria.
The Syrian rebels some factions of which the U.S CIA is funding and training to overthrow Syrian President Assad, have ADMITTED that they set off the chemical weapons. They claim that the chemical weapons were supplied by Saudi Arabia and the weapons were released accidently by mishandling according to Associated Press correspondent Dale Gavlak.
"From numerous interviews with doctors, Ghouta residents, rebel fighters and their families….many believe that certain rebels received chemical weapons via the Saudi intelligence chief, Prince Bandar bin Sultan, and were responsible for carrying out the (deadly) gas attack," writes Gavlak.

Rebels told Gavlak that they were not properly trained on how to handle the chemical weapons or even told what they were. It appears as though the weapons were initially supposed to be given to the Al-Qaeda offshoot Jabhat al-Nusra.
Dale Gavlak's credibility is very impressive. She has been a Middle East correspondent for the Associated Press for two decades and has also worked for National Public Radio (NPR) and written articles for BBC News.

Here is a link to another article Syrian Rebel Admits Using Chemical Weapons

The Obama administration claims that classified intelligence proves that it was the Assad government which carried out the attacks.

But numerous congressional members who have seen the classified intelligence information say that it is no better than the public war brief … and doesn’t prove anything!

Congressman Alan Grayson points out in the New York Times:

The documentary record regarding an attack on Syria consists of just two papers: a four-page unclassified summary and a 12-page classified summary. The first enumerates only the evidence in favor of an attack. I’m not allowed to tell you what’s in the classified summary, but you can draw your own conclusion. [I.e. it was no more impressive than the 4-page public version.]

On Thursday I asked the House Intelligence Committee staff whether there was any other documentation available, classified or unclassified. Their answer was "no."

The Syria chemical weapons summaries are based on several hundred underlying elements of intelligence information. The unclassified summary cites intercepted telephone calls, “social media” postings and the like, but not one of these is actually quoted or attached — not even clips from YouTube. (As to whether the classified summary is the same, I couldn’t possibly comment, but again, draw your own conclusion.)


And yet we members are supposed to accept, without question, that the proponents of a strike on Syria have accurately depicted the underlying evidence, even though the proponents refuse to show any of it to us or to the American public!


"Resistance to tyranny is obedience to God"...John Knox
This blog is not affiliated with