Thursday, December 25, 2008

The Next Four Years

...with very few exceptions, a look at the advisors and handlers generally reveals who will be who in the next administration, and therefore allows us to extrapolate what the new regime will actually do.

If we look at Obama this way, we are confronted with findings that are nothing short of appalling. It turns out that none other than Zbigniew Brzezinski is the principal guru of the entire Obama campaign. His influence goes beyond the critical area of foreign policy and embraces the entire public profile of post-partisan, trans-racial, and global elements assumed by this candidate. This time around, we see the mobilization, not just of Zbigniew Brzezinski himself, but of the entire Russia-hating Brzezinski clan, with son Mark Brzezinski, a veteran of the Clinton ear NSC, also on board for foreign policy, and media groupie Mika Brzezinski leading the cheering section of Obama at the cable television network MSNBC. Another wing of the Brzezinski operation is represented by son Ian Brzezinksi, currently Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Eastern Europe and NATO Affairs. Ian, it should be noted, is technically supporting Senator McCain. A kind of utility infielder in this entire effort is Matthew Brzezinksi, a supposed investigative journalist who has written an extensive profile of Ilyas Achmadov, the US resident ambassador for the Chechen terrorist organization, which appeared in 2005 in the Washington Post.

The real dimensions of the Brzezinski machine are much larger than this: .....the term Brzezinski machine indicates that entire part of the US intelligence community which assumes a left of center coloration in its public dealings. The Brzezinski machine by this definition therefore includes the strategically decisive left wing of the Central Intelligence Agency, which often does business as the National Endowment for Democracy, frequently lining up with the Soros foundations and other foundations which operate in the orbit of the intelligence community. These are more or less the same forces which dominated the Baker-Hamilton Iraq study group of 2006, and which criticized and rebelled against the policy orientation of the George Shultz-Rupert Murdoch neocon faction that had been dominant inside the US-UK banking establishment since about the time of the impeachment of Clinton in 1999.

It is therefore necessary to ignore for a moment the edifying rhetoric and Utopian platitudes spouting from the mouth of the candidate, and instead turn our attention to the handlers and advisors who represent the potential future White House palace guard, since it is these figures who will actually repair the policy options for the next tenant of the White House, and will thus actually make policy. Don't listen to the mouth; watch the motions of the hands and feet, who are in this case the advisors who will later fill the Cabinet and other key posts.
Brzezinski' influence is not limited merely to issues of war and peace in the foreign policy sphere, critical though that obviously is. The entire public persona or political profile exhibited by Obama during his campaign would appear to derive from the theoretical elaborations of Brzezinski. The key piece of evidence in this regard is Brzezinski's latest book, Second Chance. Here Brzezinski repeats his thesis that a worldwide political awakening is now taking place, and that the goal of this movement is "dignity." Brzezinski's notion of dignity, once all the obfuscation is peeled away, boils down to the quest for cultural and political self-determination and extreme identity politics on the smallest possible scale, with everything shaped by the cultural, ethnic, religious, and social peculiarities and parochialism's of the smallest groups. Brzezinski wants mini-states and micro-states with the dimensions of local control and community control projects with have so long been in vogue for counter-insurgency purposes. There is no doubt that Brzezinski's "dignity" thesis represents a declaration of war, not against this or that modern nation-state, but against the institution of the nation-state itself as we have known for the last 500 to 650 years, going back to the Visconti of Milan c. 1380 in the Italian Renaissance. If respecting the tiniest peculiarities of every conceivable group is the order of the day, then a massive wave of secession, Balkanization, subdivision, and partition of existing nation-states will be the unavoidable result. And this exactly what Brzezinski wants. The most obvious example is the secession of Kosovo province from Serbia (under KLA terrorist auspices), opening a superpower crisis between Washington and Moscow. For Africa, Brzezinski recommends the so-called "micro-nationalities" concept, which means that the national boundaries established in the 19th century should be swept aside in favor of a crazy quilt of petty tribal entities, each one so small that it could not hope to resist even a medium-sized oil multinational.

In the Middle East, knowledgeable observers have long been familiar with the Bernard Lewis Plan, which contemplates the breakup of the existing nation states into impotent, squabbling principalities, each one an easy prey for J.P. Morgan Chase, Halliburton, Blackwater, Exxon-Mobile, and other neo-feudal corporate predators. The case of Iraq is already before the eyes of the world: instead of one Iraq, we now have three---the Kurdish entity in the north, the central Sunni region, and the Shiastan in the south. Still according to the Bernard Lewis plan, Iran is one day to be divided into six or seven subdivision, Sudan into at least two parts, and Lebanon into a checkerboard of petty enclaves, while Turkey, Syria, and other Middle East states are destined to be carved and mutilated to create an independent greater Kurdistan and other will-0-the-wisps that have populated the diseased imagination of the Anglo-American geo-politicians going back to Versailles in 1918.

Policy makers in Moscow, for their part, are well aware of the Brzezinski Plan, which calls for the partition and subdivision not only of the Russian Federation, but of the age-old European Russian heartland itself. Under the Brzezinski Plan, the world map would come to look more like the map of the Holy Roman Empire in about 1600, which had some 500 theoretically independent political entities, some of them no bigger, than a small sized family farm, speckled across central Europe. Knowing Brzezinski, we must suspect that the one country destined to remain intact is Poland, perhaps in the form of a greater Poland stretching from the Baltic to the Black Sea, as it once did, under the control of an oligarchy of imbecilic petty noblemen (or "gentry") rather like Brzezinski himself. Brzezinski's notion of dignity is thus revealed as an extreme form of local control over a Bantustan or ethnic-religious mini-homeland of the type used in the past in such countries as South Africa. The greater the local control of language, culture, and related parochial issues, the greater the subjugation of the resulting entity to outside political, economic, and military interests.
If the Russia-hating Brzezinski clan dominates Obama'a foreign policy apparatus, what of economics and finance, areas which are obviously at the forefront of everyone's concern in the present Bush world economic depression, marked by hyperinflation, universal banking panic, and the death agony of the US dollar as the world reserve currency? Here the results give rise to just as much consternation. Obama's leading economics guru is Professor Austan Goolsbee, a 1991 graduate of the ultra-elitist Yale University, where he was a member of the Skull and Bones secret society, which brought us Bush the Elder and the current tenant of the White House, to say nothing of the effete patrician, John Forbes Kerry.

Goolsbee is a leading exponent of the monetarist Chicago school of economics, founded by the unlamented Milton Friedman, whose doctrines have inflicted untold genocide on the developing countries. Milton Friedman worked closely with such reactionary Republicans as Barry Goldwater, Richard Nixon, and Ronald Reagan, all of whom used his approach to chip away and undermine the economic rights won by the American people through the epoch labor struggles of the New Deal era. The most sustained application of Milton Friedman's economic views came during the fascist dictatorship of Pinochet in Chile. Goolsbee says that he is an inveterate fan of "free markets," and any treaty with free trade on the cover will automatically get his support. When asked to differentiate the Obama campaign from the others, Goolsbee has replied that the Obama campaign is more respectful of "the market." Goolsbee is hostile to winter fuel assistance for low-income families because he thinks the program in question is "bureaucratic." He also does not like any government interference with the process of foreclosing on working families and throwing them and their belongings out into the street.
Another of Obama's economics advisors is Harvard Professor Jeffrey Liebman. Liebman is devoted to the "partial privatization"of Social Security, which is exactly the strategy supported by the current Bush. Partial privatization smacks of the Newt Gingrich "let it wither on the vine" approach used by Republicans in the 1990's. Then there is David Cutler, another Harvard professor on board with Obama, who thinks that increased monetary incentives for health insurance companies and pharmaceutical firms are the way to go. In other words, Cutler wants to increase cash transfers into the insatiable paws of these corporate predators. All of this speaks volumes about what Obama would actually do if he ever got to the White House.

And no one should be fooled into thinking that the Brzezinski-left CIA-NED faction represents a peace loving alternative to the warmongering excesses of the bellicose and truculent neocons. Quite the contrary. For all their bluster, the neocons have always chosen to pick on relatively defenseless states, meaning countries with little or no ability to retaliate against the United States for the unprovoked aggression meted out to them. The neocons in short pick on the little guys, the ones with little or no intercontinental strategic weapons.

The really alarming aspect of Brzezinski is that he lacks even the bully's instinct for survival. Brzezinski is determined to use the next US administration as a vehicle for his final settling of accounts with Russia, his own personal twilight of the Gods. Brzezinksi's self conception is that he is the statesman who successfully destroyed the Soviet Union by goading Moscow to invade Afghanistan in 1979, leading Moscow's defeat in a decade-long protracted guerrilla war from which the Soviet Union never recovered. Brzezinski also takes credit for having masterminded the dismemberment of the Warsaw Pact, starting in his native Poland in 1988-1989. Brzezinski now intends to crown the edifice of his geopolitical career with the destruction of the Russian Federation, including the Balkanization and partition of European Russia itself. This is an enterprise of incalculable folly, since the Russian Federation is the one state on earth which retains the ability to incinerate the United States, as well as Japan and Western Europe, inflicting tens of millions of casualties in the first hour of a thermonuclear exchange. Brzezinski is therefore attempting to drag the world back into the worst nightmare of the Cold War.

Brzezinski himself would most likely argue that a direct US-Russian confrontation is not what he is working towards. He would assert that his goal is to play other states off against Russia, so that the United States will be able to observe the resulting conflicts from the sidelines. China is unquestionably the number one nation on Brzezinski's list of potential US adversaries who should be turned into kamikaze stooges and pawns of Anglo-American imperialism and embroiled in conflict with Moscow. The Brzezinski plan also cannot work unless the European Union is willing to subordinate its own survival to the fulfillment of Brzezinski's aggressive plans. Countries like Turkey, Syria, and Iran are all regarded by Brzezinski as potential pawns in his apocalyptic struggle with Moscow; this is why Brzezinski is not interested in a direct US attack on these countries, in the way that the neocons have been.
....the epicenter of world confrontation is rapidly shifting out of the Middle East and towards Eastern Europe and everywhere else along the borders of the Russian Federation, as well as towards Africa and Pakistan. Brzezinski is in favor of winding down the Iraq war, but certainly not because he intends to usher in an era of golden peace. Rather, he wants those resources freed up so they can be deployed on some anti-Russian or anti-Chinese front. An important secondary theater of operations for Brzezinski is increasingly Africa. The goal here is to disrupt Chinese economic cooperation with the African countries, and hopefully to eject the Chinese from Africa entirely. Brzezinski calculates that if China cannot procure the necessary oil, energy and strategic raw materials from partners in Africa, the Chinese will have no choice but to turn their attention to the oil and mineral resources of eastern Siberia and the Russian Far East.

Brzezinski intends to drive the Chinese in on eastern Siberia by using their overwhelming vulnerability to cutoffs of overseas energy, of the type that the US and British can engineer. Eastern Siberia notoriously contains much oil, many important mines, and relatively few Russians. This is the apple of discord that Brzezinksi would like to parlay into a titanic Russo-Chinese war, which he imagines would eliminate both of the main competitors to continued Anglo-American world domination. This is the reality which lurks behind the edifying messianic-utopian rhetoric of the candidate Obama. This is beyond question the most important single issue with which American voters have a right to become acquainted before the November 2008 election.......(1)

End Notes

(1)Webster Griffin Tarpley, OBAMA, The Postmodern Coup, Making Of A Manchurian Candidate, (Joshua Tree, CA: Progessive Press, 2008)p.56-62.
This blog is not affiliated with

Sunday, December 14, 2008


To illustrate the similarities that already exist between the Russian "Motherland", the German "Fatherland", and the American "Homeland", a clever story was written and passed through cyberspace by an unknown author which presents a sobering autopsy of the American political regime.... There is an unmistakable seed of truth at the center.(1)

"Let us assume I am a visitor from another planet. I am told that you earthlings spend somewhere approaching a quarter Trillion dollars every year (that's 250 billion dollars per year) on a military establishment to defend the American way of life. And let's say I walk into a cozy restaurant (I being from outer space) and strike up a conservation with an average citizen. He tells me that he is an American and a Christian and he apparently thinks the expenditure of this much money is normal under any circumstances.

So I ask him, "Why does America spend all this money?"

He scratched his head and said, "Now that the Soviet Union is dissolved, I honestly do not know."

I said, "Well why did you previously spend a quarter trillion dollars a year on your military?" And he said, "Oh! We wanted to defend ourselves form communism!"

Then I asked, "What is communism?" He replied, "Communism is an atheistic ideology that threatens freedom by military force to impose itself over our religious faith and against our free will, thus enslaving us."

I was impressed with that definition so I decided to see just how enlightened this person was. I told him that I know a little something else about communism and I asked him if he knew what communism looks like when implemented. He said, "Well, not exactly."

I asked him if he had been educated in the public school system and he said, "yes" so I assumed he had been educated on just what Americans are all fighting against, the evil ideals of the infamous communist manifesto.

The communist manifesto was created by a fellow named Moses Mordecai Levi, but most Americans know him as Karl Marx. He looked as if he didn't know that. That puzzled me but I continued. I said, The first plank of the communist manifesto states: 'Abolition of all property and land ownership and the application of all rents for public purposes.'" Then I asked the Gentleman, "Do you own your own home?"

He said, "Yes."

I said, "What happens if you stop paying your property tax?"

He said, "I can't or the sheriff will sell it."

I said, "I am confused. How can the sheriff sell what you own?"

He was silent. So I said, "Isn't it a fact that you hold title to that property but in reality, the state where you live owns the land and that is why they can sell it from you if you don't pay their rent?" And as he stared down at his weathered hands, I said, "If you pay property tax, you practice the fist plank of the communist manifesto. I had the opportunity to read this relatively thick book called the Bible.... the Bible you Christians seems to live and die by; and what Americans use to swear their oaths on; and from what I have read you Americans are in clear violation of Leviticus 25:23 if you pay property tax."

He looked even more puzzled; I thought he had known this....

I told him, "The second plank of the communist manifesto is 'Heavy progressive income tax.' You people don't fill out state form 1040's here, do you? And you don't fill out Form 1040's for the federal government, do you? Because if you do, you practice the second plank of the communist manifesto and you are in violation of your Bible at Malachi 3:8 and Deuteronomy 4:13."

He slowly loosened his tie....

I said, "The third plank of the communist manifesto is : 'Abolition of all rights of inheritance' and I asked, "How long have you lived in America?" He said, "All my life." I said, "You don't have any probate courts here, do you? You don't have a legal profession that is teaching you to fill out wills instead of creating trusts, Do you? Because if you or anyone you know has been through probate court, you have practiced the third plank of the communist manifesto and you are in violation of Deuteronomy 21:15-17 and Numbers 18:20-24."

He quickly reached for a napkin to wipe his forehead...

I continued. "The fourth plank of the communist manifesto is: 'Confiscation of property of all immigrants and rebelS.' You don't turn on the TV around April 1st and watch your government drag tax protesters off to jail, do you?" "Yes" was his reply. Then I asked him if his local newspaper ever prints tax foreclosure and delinquency notices? He said, "All the time..." "Well," I said, "If you participate in that or allow that to happen, or if that has happened to you, that's the fourth plank of the communist manifesto and it is a violation of Leviticus 26:17 and Proverbs 28:1."

His eyes started to glaze over....

I looked at him and said, "The fifth plank of the communist manifesto is: 'Centralization of credit by the creation of a national bank.'" I said, "You pay your your debts to society in silver, don't you? You don't discharge your obligations with credit do you?" He started to squirm. I said, "If you rely on this worthless green paper money when you go to purchase things, you practice the fifth plank of the communist manifesto and you are in violation of Leviticus 19:35-36, Deuteronomy 25:13-16 and the aforementioned nasty and nefarious Exodus 20:15, Exodus 20:15. Exodus 20:15 reads, 'Thou shalt not steal..."

He started to become painfully uneasy.....

I said, "The sixth plank of the communist manifesto is: 'Centralization of the means of communication and transport in the hands of the state.' You don't have ports of entry out here on the interstate, do you? Your trucks don't have to drive in and out of these scales, do they? You don't drive automobiles with the admiralty flag of the state on the back with the yearly rental fee stuck in the middle on a sticker, do you? Because of they do, they and you practice the sixth plank of the communist manifesto and you are in violation of Deuteronomy 7;2 and Exodus 23:32-33."

He started to twitch uncomfortably.....

I said, "The seventh plank of the communist manifesto is 'Government control of factories and the instruments of production owned by the state; the bringing in to cultivation of wastelands and the use of the soil in accordance with a common plan.'" I went on to say, "You don't have a Bureau of Land management do you? You don't live under under the administrative circumstance of the Department of Agriculture, do you? And you don't have companion circumstances in the state law along with EPA and a host of other things, do you? Because if you allow yourself to live under that system, you practice the seventh plank of the communist manifesto and you are in violation of Leviticus 25:1-7......actually Leviticus 25:1-10.

He closed his eyes tightly as he forced himself to breath....

I said, "The eighth plank of the communist manifesto reads: 'Equal obligation of all to work. Establishment of industrial armies, especially for agriculture.'" I asked, "Do you have a Social Security number?" I assumed yes, as he nodded his head slowly. I said, "Well, doesn't that mean that you're a Fourteenth Amendment juristic person, a merchant in interstate commerce under contract over time for profit and gain in a regulated enterprise and you have waived all your Constitutional rights under contract in exchange for privileges, franchises and immunities?" He said, "Privileges?" I said, "Yes, privileges! Private Law: Privilege." His hands instinctively clenched. I said, "If you have a Social Security Number, you practice the eighth plank of the communist manifesto and you are in violation of your Bible at Leviticus 19:13 and Deuteronomy 24:14-15."

He became physically agitated....

"Number nine on the communist manifesto," I said, "is, 'A combination of agriculture with manufacturing industries....gradual abolition of the distinction between town and country by a more equitable distribution of population over the country.' You don't have a Federal Emergency Management Association do you? You don't have FEMA at the state level, do you? Because if you do, you practice the ninth plank of the communist manifesto and you're in violation of Leviticus 25:1-7."

By this time he was just plain angry....

I finished by quoting the tenth plank of the communist manifesto: "Free education for all children in public schools. Conform education with industrial productions." I said, "Are you a homeowner?" He said, "Yes." I said, "You pay the property tax?" He said, "Yes." I said, "Do you know where 75 percent of the property tax goes in this state?" He said, "No." I said, "It goes to support the public school system. I looked at him and said, "You don't send your children off to the state to get educated, do you? You raise them at home the way God told the original Moses to tell you to do, don't you?" As he got up and walked away I said, "If you support the public education establishment you are in violation of Deuteronomy 4:9-10., Deuteronomy 6:1-25 and Deuteronomy 11:19...and you practice the tenth plank of the communist manifesto."

As he stopped and turned back toward me, the look of a wild animal about to kill flickered across his face. I relaxed my tone and suggested these words: "It looks as if this is all new to you. I apologize for this, but what I am trying to figure out is, why would Americans allow their government to knowingly spend 250 billion "fake dollars" a year from your pocket to defend themselves against something that your government has willfully and consciously implemented under the guise of the color of law, and that demands that the people practice every second of every minute of every hour of every day under the guise of democracy and not the truth....which is communism? Is that sick or what?

He said, "My God, I never thought about that! What do you think we should do?"

I replied, "Probably what you failed to do all along, and that is to think for yourself. Listen to God and act in His best interest.... which is your best interest. It does seem that is why the Bible is here in the first place. Demand the Bible be implemented instead of communism. It seems the future of America depends on it."


None are more hopelessly enslaved, as those who falsely believe they are free....

The people (politicians) who believe in SOCIALIST and COMMUNIST concepts, especially those who pass laws implementing these slavery ideas, are traitors to their oath of office and to the Constitution of the United States of America... KNOW YOUR ENEMY ...YOUR ENEMY IS WITHIN! Steve

End Notes

1. Pastor Butch Paugh, Minuteman News, The Ten Planks of the American Communist Manifesto, November 2008, 224 Hurd Road, Nettie, West Virginia 26681.
This blog is not affiliated with

Sunday, December 07, 2008


Let us never forget this day, December 7, 1941. A day that will live in infamy. Let us never forget those who volunteered to serve on that fateful day; who gave their life's blood so that we may live free.

Let us never forget our God who has blessed us so richly and abundantly.(click the title to see the video). Let us never forget our Judeo- Christian heritage which made this country great. Let us never forget the cost of our freedom!

Let us not forget the words of Thomas Jefferson.
The central bank is an institution of the most deadly hostility existing against the Principles and form of our Constitution. I am an Enemy to all banks discounting bills or notes for anything but coin. If the American People allow private banks to control the issuance of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the People of all their Property until their Children will wake up homeless on the continent their Fathers conquered.--Thomas Jefferson.
Today, the World is now witnessing the prophetic words of Thomas Jefferson coming true. Even worse, these American people, whose ancestors laid the very foundation for what was once the greatest and freest Nation on Earth, have been reduced to what is commonly referred to as "sheeple".
a term of disparagement, a portmanteau created by combining the words "sheep" and "people". It is often used to denote persons who acquiesce to authority, and thus undermine their own human individuality. The implication of sheeple is that as a collective, people believe whatever they are told, especially if told so by authority figures, without processing it to be sure that it is an accurate representation of the real world around them.
It goes without saying that these Americans do not see themselves in this most truest of lights as they continue living their lives in near total ignorance of the greater catastrophes soon to befall them, all of which they have been, and continue to be, warned about. But, they spurn these warnings, or laugh them off as mere conspiracy theory, as they continue to believe the lies being fed them by their propaganda media organs which they never seem to realize are nothing but the mouthpieces for the fascist corporate forces delivering them to the slaughter houses they will soon come to know.--Pastor Butch.


This blog is not affiliated with