This summer we are likely to suffer another terror attack, a "911-2B."
The list of notables' quotables begins with the springtime warning of the vice president to NBC's Tim Russert on Meet the Press:
April 15, 2007, Dick Cheney: "The greatest threat now is 'a 9/11' occurring ... with a nuclear weapon in the middle of one of our own cities."
June 3, 2007, Dennis Milligan, Chairman of the Arkansas Republican Party: "I believe fully the president is doing the right thing, and I think all we need is some attacks on American soil like we had on [Sept. 11, 2001]."
July 1, 2007, ABC News: "A secret U.S. law enforcement report, prepared for the Department of Homeland Security, warns that al Qaeda is planning a terror "spectacular" this summer."
July 11, 2007, Michael Chertoff, Homeland Security chief: "I believe we are entering a period this summer of increased risk."
July 20, 2007, Paul Craig Roberts, former Assistant Secretary of the Treasury: "Whether authentic or orchestrated, an attack will activate Bush's new executive orders [NSPD-51], which create a dictatorial police state in event of national emergency."
July 24, 2007, Peter DeFazio, House Homeland Security Committee member: "I just can't believe they're going to deny a member of Congress the right of reviewing how they plan to conduct the government of the United States after a significant terrorist attack. Maybe the people who think there's a conspiracy out there are right."
DeFazio's Oregon is the target of Noble Resolve," an upcoming 9/11-2B military exercise scheduled for August 20-24 that includes a nuclear attack on Portland. Pacific Northwesterners are increasingly alarmed that they may be the targets of a false flag nuclear attack, or the fallout from it. You can't blame them. After all, according to all sources, left and right, 911-2B is the only thing that can revitalize the war president and the war plan.
What is a false flag operation?
Captain Eric H. May explains it brilliantly.
False flag attack is one in which you attack your own people, then blame it on a group of people you want to attack. It's a radical stratagem for instantly creating hatred, and it's common, historically speaking, all the way from ancient to modern times. For example:
The Roman Emperor Nero burned Rome, then blamed it on emerging Christianity.
The German Fuhrer Hitler burned the Reichstag, then blamed it on communist Jewry.
The American President Bush demolished the World Trade Center, then blamed it on radical Islam.
At present, "false flag" is a highly relevant term, as Rep. DeFazio and his chief of staff Penny Dodge have learned from their constituents back home in Oregon.
The people of Portland are also becoming very concerned over this military exercise in view of the recently signed NSPD 51,and HSPD-20 by the President. These two directives allow the President to declare martial law and dictatorship with out congressional oversight. Some have compared these recent presidential directives to suspension of the Weimar Constitution of 1919 by article 48 by which Hilter demanded and obtained removal of freedom of the press, freedom of assembly, and freedom of speech.
Just recently Senator Trent Lott (32nd Degree Mason) gave a very specific warning. Listen to his frightening comments:
"Without mentioning a specific threat to the Capitol, Senate Minority Whip Trent Lott (R-Miss.) ominously advised Thursday that Congress needed to pass changes to terrorist surveillance laws before leaving for the August recess and warned that otherwise 'the disaster could be on our doorstep'."
"When asked if people should leave Washington, D.C., during the month of August, Lott responded, 'I think it would be good to leave town in August, and it would probably be good to stay out until September the 12th'." (Italics and emphasis mine)
Lott was complaining bitterly that Congress was not going to pass the dramatic increase in "terrorist surveillance laws" before the legislative body recessed for the month of August. Since the original 9/11 attack, many discerning individuals have been warning that the Bush Administration might need another major terrorist attack before it could get all the dictatorial laws out of Congress which it so fervently desires.
On Friday, August 3rd, President Bush demanded that Congress stay in session longer to give him even greater power before the August recess.
""WASHINGTON - President Bush said Friday that Congress must stay in session until it approves legislation modernizing a U.S. law governing eavesdropping on foreigners ... 'We've worked hard and in good faith with the Democrats to find a solution, but we are not going to put our national security at risk. Time is short'."
"Time is short", the President intones. He is right -- the time Americans have left to enjoy our freedoms dwindles every single day. The only question is "when will the next terror attack occur"? When that day comes, either the President, the FEMA Director, or the Homeland Security Director will command that all functions of government shut down, while the "enemies of peace are quelled".
According to Joel Skousen:
The latest terror warning to sweep through the internet comes from Israeli-American counter-terrorism expert Juval Aviv. "What they're going to do," he claims "is hit six, seven or eight cities simultaneously to show sophistication and really hit the public. This time it will not only be big cities. They're going to try to hit rural America. They want to send a message to rural America: 'You're not protected. If you figured out that if you just move out of New York and move to Montana or to Pittsburgh, you're not immune. We're going [to] get you wherever we can and it's easier there than in New York."
Aviv claims the next attack will come in the next 90 days and hit the small normal type targets I have been warning are the standard way in which normal terrorism acts. He is either predicting these events based upon an accurate knowledge of how terror should act (but hasn't been in the US, which only experiences high profile attacks) or he is privy, through Israel, to the next level of government engineered attacks that are coming." Joel Skousen's World Affairs Brief (http://www.worldaffairsbrief.com)
Captain May reminds us:
As I pointed out in my column last week, Next 9/11, Summer 2007?, Operation Noble Resolve, to be conducted in August, will involve extensive mobilization of Homeland Security and U.S. military forces to simulate a wide range of catastrophic terror events in Oregon. The grand finale will be the simulation of a ten kiloton atomic bomb in Portland.
But what if they decide to use a real bomb rather than simulate it?
No doubt 99 percent of the participants in Noble Resolve believe it is a mere readiness exercise, but what if one percent -- inserted by Bush cronies -- believe it is the perfect cover for setting off a real nuke? This is, after all, what happened on 9/11/01, when U.S. military commands were simulating terror airline strikes on U.S. skyscrapers -- which is exactly what happened. It's also what happened on 7/7/05, when London police were simulating terror subway strikes -- which is exactly what happened. The criminal one percent effectively hijacked those exercises while the 99 percent of honest participants were as shocked as the general public, and simply carried on with the scenario they had been practicing, which had now become "live."
When the horrific events that government exercises are supposed to be practicing against turn out to be the exact events that occur, then it is insanity to continue to put blind faith in the motives of the government. On the other hand, it is highest sanity to document, organize, and protest against a possible false flag attack, as the constituents and congressional folk of Oregon are now doing.
Friends remember this prediction from one individual who operated at the highest levels of our government before retiring; General Tommy Franks who lead the invasion of Iraq.
"Gen. Tommy Franks says that if the United States is hit with a weapon of mass destruction that inflicts large casualties, the Constitution will likely be discarded in favor of a military form of government ... Franks said that 'the worst thing that could happen' is if terrorists acquire and then use a biological, chemical or nuclear weapon that inflicts heavy casualties. If that happens, Franks said, '... the Western world, the free world, loses what it cherishes most, and that is freedom and liberty we’ve seen for a couple of hundred years in this grand experiment that we call democracy'.” ("Gen. Franks Doubts Constitution Will Survive WMD Attack", John O. Edwards, NewsMax.com, Friday, Nov. 21, 2003.)
At least we have been warned. He did not hold out the phony hope that we would get our Constitutional form of government back once the "enemies of freedom" have been vanquished.
And have no fellowship with the unfruitfull works of darkness , but rather reprove them. Wherefore he saith, Awake thou that sleepest, and arise from the dead, and Christ shall give thee light. See then that ye walk circumspectly, not as fools, but as wise, Redeeming the time, because the days are evil. Ephesians 5:11, 14,15. KJV
For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places. Wherefore take unto you the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to withstand in the evil day, and having done all, to stand. Ephesians 6:12, 13. KJV
This article may be reproduced WITHOUT CHANGE and in its entirety for non-commercial and non-political purposes.thechristianobserver.blogspot.com